|
|
by Rein 19 Jul 2009 06:30 Tony, reading Tenorio Casal again we have the following chronology: 10c red 1st tipograficas 01.10.1935 - 1 printing - must be type I 2nd tipograficas 17.12.1935 - 1 printing - type II and III?? 1st estereotipada 01.06.1936 - 11 printings - type II and III?? 3rd tipograficas xx.09.1938 - 2 printings 10c chestnut 1st offset-litho 16.03.1939 - ????? 1st estereotipada 04.11.1939 - 8 printings 2nd estereotipada 20.06.1943 - 5 printings The red type II and type III are mostly from 1936 - if they are from before 01.06.1935 they must be tipograficas - meaning a "plate "made up of loose types or dies.... The cancellations of 1936 are mainly of August or later! One copy of May 1936 - without the dot underneath the "A'!
|
|
by Rein 19 Jul 2009 08:35 The cancellation dates should help but also the fact that of the 10c red type II/III "tipograficas "only 4 printings had been made of which 2 after September 1938! and of the "estereotipadas "11 printings. A "family tree "might establish which characteristic got first! The "- "in type III was there before the dot underneath the "A "and so was the blot underneath the first "V "...
Whether they can still be spotted in the 10c chestnut is not conclusive but may give some ideas. |
|
The 10c Rivadavia in red has 3 [THREE] types! The 3rd had 2 characteristics that I have described before. It turns out now that there 2 more characteristics - not always clearly printed and hence visible - that I have overlooked so far . The "-" above "DAVIA " had been described before so had the "." under the second "A"! |
El 10c Rivadavia en rojo tiene 3 [tres] tipos! La 3 tiene 2 características que he descrito antes. Resulta ahora que hay 2 más características - no siempre, claramente impresas y por lo tanto visible - que han pasado por alto hasta ahora . El "-" por encima "DAVIA" había sido descrito antes, así que tenía el "." abajo la segunda "A"! |
|
|
|
|
